“One more thing I know about the Negro.”


(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

After the election and re-election of President Obama, some Americans seriously considered the notion that America had become a post-racial country. Seemingly acting in accord with this notion, the Supreme Court of the United States has made rulings based on an assumption that racism is no longer a significant factor in America. Things seemed good, at least in that perception of reality. And then Cliven Bundy and Donald Sterling started talking.

Cliven Bundy originally gained national fame when the federal government decided to seize his cattle in response to his illegally grazing his cattle on federal land for decades. Some conservative politicians, Fox News personalities and armed militia rushed to his defense—to stand between law enforcement and someone accused of stealing from the government.

Not surprisingly, some critics pointed out that Bundy seemed to be engaged in all that conservatives profess to hate, namely sponging off the government, breaking the law and defying legal authority. Sean Hannity emerged as his staunchest media defender, despite the fact that Hannity had, on previous shows, denounced and railed against people who had done the same sorts of things—namely sponging off the state and breaking the law.

In an interesting, but perhaps not surprising, turn of events, Bundy made some claims that most people would regard as rather racist: “I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro. They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”

Not surprisingly, many of those who had rushed to embrace him suddenly released their grip and ran to put as much daylight as they could between themselves and their former hero. This distancing could be dismissed as mere political theater and not an expression of actual distaste. That is, it might be claimed that his former supporters abandoned him not because of their own moral commitments but because they are well aware that overt racism no longer sells as well as it did.

After the Bundy story started cooling down in the media, Donald Sterling gained the spotlight when a recording of him making racist comments was leaked to the public. While Sterling’s views on race and gender have not been a secret, these remarks resulted in NBA commissioner Adam Silver banning him for life from NBA events and imposing a $2.5 million fine. There is also talk of compelling him to sell his team (based on the clause regarding damage done by an owner’s actions).

Not surprisingly, Sterling has been widely condemned and his punishment applauded. Sponsors and advertisers have also pulled away from the Clippers. While this might seem like a victory for morality, it seems unlikely that the NBA and the sponsors were primarily motivated by ethics. After all, Sterling is well known for his views and racism has been evil since, well, the advent of racism. The more plausible explanation is that Sterling’s words did financial damage to the NBA and failure to publicly punish him would probably have cost the NBA a considerably amount of money. As such, this was a triumph of money and not morality. In the case of Bundy, it was a triumph of politics and not principle. Or perhaps not.

While it is certainly reasonable to explain the response of the politicians and pundits in terms of political expediency and the response of the NBA in terms of financial expediency, there are reasons why racism now comes with a high cost politically and financially. One explanation popular with some is that there is a liberal conspiracy to punish people for being racists—that the liberals are somehow in the wrong for considering racists to be wrong and imposing penalties on them for their racism. Perhaps this is based on the belief that the liberals are not sincere and that race is just a political game-piece to them. This speculation is, of course, based on an “unknown fact” about the secret motive of liberals.

Another explanation is that while racism remains, the arc of the moral universe has bent further towards justice and now most Americans correctly regard racism as evil—or at least it is recognized as something that is to be publicly condemned. If this is the case, then while America is not post-racial, at least it is further along the moral arc. This is, as Dr. King had claimed, a step towards making good on the promise of America—we profess to hold all people to be created equal and to be endowed with inalienable rights. We also claim to believe in liberty and justice for all.  Because we seem to be taking these moral principles seriously, racism is now quite costly—so much so that it factors strongly in the pragmatic decisions of politicians and businesspeople.


My Amazon Author Page

My Paizo Page

My DriveThru RPG Page

Enhanced by Zemanta
  1. Kevin Henderson

    What directly motivates organzations is money. It is heartening to know that even if organizations are now obligated to act a certain way not because of morality but instead because of their pocketbooks, that is better than nothing.

    The underlying motivation is a morally good one. Indeed, if the press and national sports agencies were to distance themselves from a Chirstian or other religious fanatic, that would also be a good thing even if their intention is not to not support the fanatic, but rather follow their inution about how viewers and supportors would respond if they did, in fact, support such a fanatic. Alas, such a day has not yet come for indirect secular motivation. It has come, in large part, for many racial, gender, and even sexual (LGBT) causes.

  2. Even though it was a favorite quotation of Martin Luther King, Jr. it was actually authored by Theodore Parker in 1853: “I do not pretend to understand the moral universe; the arc is a long one. . . . But from what I see I am sure it bends toward justice.”

    Parker was an abolitionist, and Unitarian minister who died just before the Civil War began. I’ve seen this quote attributed to Dr. King hundreds of times, even by President Obama. While you do not directly put these words in the mouth of Dr. King it seems that it’s implied in your writing. I just want to see Theodore Parker given credit for his own words.

  3. to reside in along with develop the lower involving Ilmatar’s underwater. The retail price, naturally, ended up being who’s needed six to eight days and nights to go up into on the floor. Your force big http://gafasoakleybaratas.webnode.es/ difference relating to the more than 200 atmospheres towards the end in the seashore plus the 50 % normal with the floor place supposed a new man might not only receive the bends in case they gone way up quickly―he’d practically break open. There are va

  4. as well as anxious to take the to make sure you fluids. For that matter, a link by means of resort mangroves and additionally any recognizable fondness about crabs declare that it’s certainly designed just for water Oakley foraging: Krebs (1979) thought of as the software a fabulous crab doctor. This approach option is normally in accordance with a lot of areas of this approach varanid’s structure. The country’s cranium is normally remarkably fat-free and additionally tremendous (fea

Leave a Comment

NOTE - You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>